Anew studypublished in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences bring out that after the Deep Water Horizon calamity , engineer and scientists were n’t sure that capping the Macondo well was the best idea . In fact , it could have lead to an even larger , difficult to control tumble .
Ars Technica hasa nice poston the study , which explains the employment of expert after the disaster . A Well Integrity Team was piece to analyze the composition of the sea floor around the well to estimate out if a cap would be enough to contain all of the fossil oil in the Macondo reservoir .
The concern was n’t the strength of the cap — experts were fairly sure it would curb — but rather the strength of sea floor around it . You probably recall the horrifying trope of oil unrelentingly spue into the ocean . The concern was that capping the well would but disperse that pressure beneath the sea level from which it could spring up in numberless unlike position .

In other words , capping one out - of - ascendancy well could have lead to a much bigger , much hard to control deep water job . The cay would be to carefully monitor the pressure sensation of the well after it was capped so that the solution could be abort if it turned out it was only making things unsound . According to Ars :
Armed with model simulations of how the well would behave in various scenarios , they cautiously watched the pressure inside the well slowly build after the cap was put on . If it climbed to 7,500psi within six hours , they knew the well was entire and would moderate . If the hale stick below 6,000 psi , they knew the well was leaking and they would need to abort to avert a blowout .
as luck would have it , the crownwork worked . Science saved the sidereal day .

[ PNASviaArs Technica ]
crude spillsScience
Daily Newsletter
Get the serious technical school , science , and acculturation news show in your inbox daily .
intelligence from the future tense , delivered to your present tense .
You May Also Like












![]()
