While it ’s undeniable thattech played a major partin helping hunt down the two Boston bombardment suspects , it sure enough was n’t facial credit that help . Boston Police have admitted that their facial recognition system “ did not identify ” the suspects .
https://gizmodo.com/the-tech-that-helped-take-down-marathon-bombing-suspect-5995125
Speaking to the Washington Post , Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davisexplained :
“ The engineering came up empty even though both Tsarnaevs ’ images be in prescribed databases : Dzhokhar had a Massachusetts driver ’s license ; the brothers had de jure immigrated ; and Tamerlan had been the field of study of some FBI investigation . ”
Instead , the FBI were front with a rather more boring task — and one agentive role catch the same segment of video 400 time . Four . Hundred . fourth dimension . Over time , watching and re - watching picture allowed them to “ construct a narrative out of a random jumble of picture from thousands of different phones and cameras ” , harmonize tothe Post .
The prescribed line on the Reddit contributions to the investigation is interesting , too : the Post reportsthat “ in addition to being almost universally wrong , the theories developed via social medium complicated the official probe , agree to jurisprudence enforcement officials ” . Indeed , the official release of suspicious photo on Thursday was an endeavor to determine impairment being done by internet theory . Clearly , sometimes the previous - fashioned techniques work best . [ Washington PostviaArs Technica ]
Facial RecognitionSurveillance
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , skill , and culture news in your inbox daily .
News from the future , delivered to your nowadays .
You May Also Like
